psychology

The Path Within: Exploring One’s Emotional Landscape through a Metaphysical Lens

Embrace kindness, grace, tenderness, and understanding towards yourself as you proceed on a journey of self-reflection, integrating the various facets that form your unique identity. A moment of tranquillity. Let down your guard and approach yourself with gentleness. Set aside time for introspection, allowing your thoughts, fears, and emotions to surface. As you reopen past wounds, you can create a path for healing and discover methods to effectively process them in ways that feel safe to you. Engage in this self-exploration with an open heart and mind, ready to confront both your strengths and vulnerabilities. Recognise that this journey is about identifying what needs to be healed or changed, as well as about appreciating the resilience and wisdom you have gained through your experiences. Acknowledge the courage it takes to delve into the depths of your psyche, exploring the complex fabric of your thoughts, beliefs, and emotions. Seek to understand the intricate layers of your being, and how they shape the way you perceive the world around you. Remember, this process is a powerful act of self-love and self-care, an essential step towards embracing your true self and living a more conscious, fulfilled life.

I believe self-worth is a key element in all of this. It would be ideal to ground our journey of self-discovery and integration in a strong sense of self-worth. A self-assured basis, at least in relation to worthiness, enables us to navigate our emotions and interactions with others from a place of confidence and authenticity. Personally, I feel in alignment with the view that every human being possesses intrinsic worth from the beginning of existence. In Sculptor in the Sky, Teal Swan emphasises this aspect as well, while pointing out that society often conditions people to believe that worth is contingent on achievement, success, or acquiring skills – thus on external validation. This societal conditioning leads to a misconception that one must constantly strive and perform to be valuable. Miss Swan encourages readers to recognise and reconnect with their intrinsic value, independent of external factors. I believe that striving for achievements and gaining skills and knowledge is beneficial, provided it doesn’t overshadow our intrinsic worth or lead our spirit astray from what truly matters. There is also the suggestion that deep within, people hold profound knowledge and understanding about life and existence, and that there are great advantages to remembering it – because this knowledge is often lost or obscured due to life experiences, societal norms, and cultural conditioning. The aim is to help people rediscover and reconnect with this innate wisdom, which Miss Swan believes is essential for personal and spiritual growth. Another key theme that is relevant to our narrative is the importance of recognising one’s ability to shape their own life, so that one moves away from victimhood to a position of strength and agency.

Let’s shift our focus to the realm of conflict and our emotional responses in these challenging situations. Contemplate your instinctive emotional response during conflicts. You might lean towards anger, anxiety, sadness, defensiveness, guilt, shame, or fear. Reflect on your typical modes of expression when distressed. You could find yourself redirecting, seeking mediation, ignoring, compromising, yelling, blaming, or perhaps withdrawing completely. Ponder on whether your reaction is a direct response to the present situation or a reflection of past traumas and unresolved issues. Do you notice patterns in your behaviour that are repetitive and perhaps unhelpful in resolving conflicts? Do you tend to resort to projection, casting others into roles that align with your own internal narratives, usually associating the person in front of you with other figures from your history? Consider whether you are confronting the person right in front of you or an amalgamation of phantoms from your past, the manifestations of your emotional baggage. In our interactions, we believe we’re arguing over current issues, but often, we’re actually grappling with deeper, long-standing emotions like feeling ignored, undervalued, or excluded. As we subconsciously attempt to resolve these past issues, we find ourselves repeating these scenarios, hoping for a different outcome. However, to truly change the narrative, we must live in the present and recognise people for who they are now, instead of holding them accountable for past hurts inflicted by others. If the person in front of you says things that cause you to spiral while crossing a boundary that you explicitly expressed, feeling betrayed and disillusioned is a natural, healthy response that is in alignment with self-love. After a boundary violation that isn’t very severe and, as a result, we choose to forgive, it’s wise to create a strategy outlining our expectations for how the other person should engage with us moving forward. On the other hand, when we’re talking about something unforgivable, some of us might respond with anger (which is valid), others might be tempted to rationalise, to justify the other person’s behaviour; in the process, we might recognise that the person operates from a wounded, unhealed part that has to rely on all sorts of defences. If another person’s energy is not beneficial to the current version of you, on this path of self-care, worth, and discovery, don’t feel pressured to be their saviour, it’s not your responsibility. It’s a better idea to protect yourself, and perhaps, if it feels right, turn inward and think of when you yourself allowed the wounded part of you to be in charge in similar ways.

Consider the emotions in others that unsettle you the most. What judgments do you harbour towards these feelings? Ask yourself if you allow these emotions in your own life. Identify the traits in others that you find off-putting, such as greed, negativity, insensitivity, or arrogance, and explore whether you notice any echoes of these traits within yourself. Reflect on how acknowledging these traits in others impacts your interactions and perceptions. Ponder the possibility that your reaction to these traits might reveal deeper aspects of your own character that you have yet to fully understand or accept. Use this awareness as an opportunity for self-improvement, aiming to cultivate compassion and empathy both for yourself and for others. That way, you can foster a deeper sense of connection and understanding in your relationships. There are also times when you might feel a strong resistance towards someone, without realising why, exactly. If you ever feel repelled by someone’s personality, in real life or online, try to wonder why. Sure, sometimes, it could be pretty justified, they might be hypocritical or not align with your standards, they might hold psychopathic, extremist views, or be someone who crosses your boundaries of emotional safety with their views or attitude in some way. In which case, that’s not something you have to concern yourself with. But, if you can’t quite tell why the things they say or write about bother you that much, look at what you might supress in your own personality. Analyse this person and analyse yourself.

A journey of self-discovery has to transcend acceptance – it’s about integration. I was reflecting on instances where I found myself inexplicably repulsed by someone’s demeanour or way of interacting; I soon realised it was sometimes my own suppressed judgments resurfacing. Bare in mind I’m not referring to instances where I’ve actually been wronged or harmed by people. In the rare instances where someone’s personality repelled me without a reason I could pinpoint at the time, I began to explore the idea of the existence of various “selves” within one person, each representing different facets of our being, even the disowned selves – our shadow, which should ideally be integrated. In my case, perhaps it was not just one-dimensional; maybe there were conflicting aspects at play. What bothered me was that the person was overly critical and negative, while at the same time smiling most of the time and seeming friendly, which I perceived to be unpleasantly contradictory. Delving into this approach, I realised how interesting and unintuitive the process of integrating our shadows can be – the suppressed judgments and unexplored aspects of ourselves that surface in response to certain personalities can be revealed to us in ways that surprise us. Splitting ourselves into different selves, each exhibiting unique traits and perspectives, allows for a more comprehensive understanding of the human mind. Like a psychological mosaic meant for a holistic self-awareness, you have to embrace both the light and shadow elements within.

Let’s focus on happiness. In his book on bliss, Osho differentiates between happiness, pleasure, and bliss, emphasising that true happiness is a state of being, not just a fleeting emotion. He suggests that happiness is a deeper, more sustainable state than pleasure, which is often momentary, hedonistic, and externally driven. Bliss is a heightened state of joy and contentment, with a transcendental element, stemming from a profound inner peace and self-understanding. In the context of one’s self-discovery journey, in my opinion it’s important to recognise that while happiness involves embracing and integrating our full spectrum of experiences and emotions, there is also a place for the innocent pleasures of life. Little joys, such as the enjoyment of the scent of a distinguished, evocative perfume, a beautiful building, or experiencing a random act of kindness have their value. These small pleasures, while fleeting, add colour and texture to our lives. They are not in opposition to true happiness, but rather, they can coexist as part of a balanced and fulfilling life. Embracing these simple joys is not superficial; it is acknowledging and appreciating the various aspects of life that bring us momentary delight. As we strive for a deeper happiness and integrate our various selves, including our shadow aspects, we can also allow ourselves to enjoy these innocent pleasures without guilt. This balanced approach leads to a more authentic and holistic sense of joy, blending the pursuit of deeper, internal fulfilment with the appreciation of life’s simple pleasures. Being able to appreciate such moments of pure, unfiltered, spontaneous joy, is indicative of a healthy, balanced perspective on life and a deep capacity for gratitude and presence. In our interactions with friends, we can share these joys while also engaging in deeper, more meaningful connections, embodying a true sense of happiness that encompasses both the light and the playful, enjoyable moments of life. The problem appears when we solely seek temporary pleasures, mistaking them for complete happiness, while neglecting the deeper work of integrating our various selves, including our shadow aspects, in order to resolve internal conflicts and reach inner harmony. As mentioned, happiness involves embracing the full spectrum of our experiences and emotions, finding balance and harmony within. It is about acknowledging and integrating the light and shadow within us. This understanding allows us to seek a more authentic and lasting sense of joy, which is less about external validation or fleeting pleasures and more about a deep, internal sense of fulfilment.

In moments of comfort and ease with friends, consider the sides of yourself you reveal. You may be playful, thoughtful, or reserved. Address any misperceptions others might have about you that cause pain. Envision the kind of recognition and appreciation you desire from others, and think about ways to embody those qualities now. Reflect on which emotions you would like to become more at ease with. Ponder how these comfortable interactions with friends might serve as a mirror, reflecting aspects of yourself that you may not regularly acknowledge or appreciate. Delve into the reasons why certain emotions are more challenging for you to embrace, and contemplate strategies to cultivate a healthier relationship with them. Acknowledge the importance of vulnerability in building deeper connections and trust with others. As you work towards becoming more comfortable with a wider range of emotions, remember that this process is a key part of personal growth and developing a more authentic and fulfilling way of relating to both yourself and the people around you.

Finally, identify a behavioural pattern or habit you’re prepared to transform. This introspective journey is about self-awareness, but also about evolving into the most genuine and enlightened version of yourself. This process of self-exploration is a profound step towards spiritual growth and personal fulfilment. Embrace the courage required to confront and change these deep-seated habits. Understand that this transformation may challenge you, but it is a significant part of your journey towards self-mastery. As you pursue this path, be patient and kind to yourself, recognising that change is a gradual process. Remember, this journey is also about understanding the underlying motivations and emotions that drive them. This way, you cultivate a deeper sense of self-awareness, leading to more meaningful and lasting change. This path to personal evolution opens up new possibilities for joy, fulfilment, and a more authentic way of living.

The intricate journey of self-reflection, embracing our inherent worth whilst inviting change and avoiding stagnating in unhappiness, and understanding our complex emotional responses to conflict and relationships are deeply intertwined with the universal fabric of existence. As we navigate our internal world, confronting and integrating our shadow selves, and striving towards personal growth, we inherently influence the collective consciousness. This interconnectedness accentuates the significance of our emotional and spiritual journey, highlighting how our inner transformations contribute to the broader mosaic of human experience and the universe itself. This interplay between the personal and the universal has to be recognised, in order to approach our journey with a heightened sense of purpose and awareness, understanding that our quest for self-mastery and fulfilment is deeply connected to the greater whole, designing a more empathetic and unified world.

Characters’ psychology

Both inspired by and afraid of her ineffable power to rise again and again, ever stronger, and pierce the essence of everything, he doesn’t know what he feels. She is wonderful. She is terrifying. She gives the impression that she is slightly aware of it, but not in a conceited way. In a playful way. In a way that makes you see the world as wonderful and terrifying. She is wild. She can’t be tamed. She has a rich, specific belief system, and yet she never wastes an opportunity to explore and gain new insights. It’s a rare occurrence for her to consistently dream about another person, but when she does, it can get pretty intense. And it must mean the other person is wonderful too. And yet she doesn’t want another person to become her world. Her world is thrilling, mostly safe but occasionally dangerous, fluctuating between periods of unpredictability and order. She is not necessarily a thrill-seeker, but a huntress of good feelings and of the sublime, the marvellous, the ethereal, with a relentless desire to feel alive. She likes being in control and having freedom. Her resplendent mind transcends boundaries. Her defining characteristics are creativity and a natural inclination towards divergent thinking. As we know, there are both advantages and disadvantages to this, just like everything else. Whilst brainstorming, coming up with a myriad of ideas and generating stimulating thoughts is highly desirable, her tendencies also make it difficult to have a structure in life, to focus on one thing at a time. A successful project requires you to eventually switch to convergent thinking, to stick to a strategy. Her inner life is a film with a non-linear narrative. He is different, in this sense, there is a promising duality between them. Since they play in different films, there is no way to tell if their narratives can harmoniously intertwine. Time will tell.

An allegory

Let your mind paint a rainy cityscape. A girl dressed in black, with a mask and noisy heels steps on the sidewalk. Her tears merge with the raindrops. Each tear encapsulates an entire mini-universe, lingering on her cheeks, like undetectable tokens of fluid vulnerability. A stranger passes her by, closely. His slightly curious, slightly worried gaze briefly meets hers. That’s when she remembers she’s in a public space: Maybe the distress in her eyes was visible, after all. His face doesn’t show pity, which is fortunate, for she hates pity – she’s always been too proud for it. But maybe she misinterpreted his facial expression and it wasn’t really concern. Maybe he misinterpreted her expression as something else too. He reminds her of someone – someone kind, sweet, wise, and very dear to her. Someone who knew how to unleash her vulnerable and dreamy side simply by being himself. The rare realness of this person was always rewarded with the privilege of meeting all the facets of her personality.

What her expression conveyed was grief. All-consuming grief, manifested as an affliction of the mind and the body. The inner chaos-intense, the body-tense, during the painful procession. Towards the funeral of the distilled dreams of being. Still alive are the hopes to resurrect the dreams the next day. Another dream, of inner peace, is born. She is wondering when it will materialise. Meanwhile, sweet echoes fill the mind as background music, sung by the Light Beings, ‘Talent. Creativity. Intelligence. Beauty. Resilience. Strength. Kindness’ This is not your typical funeral song. This is one of those days when the melodic discourse is played like a mantra to assuage the mind, to overpower the inner wailing from the funeral rite, to self-induce good vibes, in order to help her keep putting one foot in front of the other foot instead of collapsing. Like an incantation, to banish other toxic thoughts. It’s one of those days when other aspects resonate too strongly, sucking the power out of the good ones, and releasing dark energy. These other forces are not as clear. The noise they express themselves in is a sort of gibberish, a chaotic, harmful nonsense, inducing a heaviness of the heart.

There are rooms she doesn’t unlock in her mind, because she doesn’t want to let the poison out. She wants to stay pure. Untainted. One room contains dusty effigies of blacklisted figures. They’re not distinctive or intelligible, they’re merged into each other, shape-shifting embodiments of damaging thoughts. They are all locked away together in a claustrophobic space, drenched in darkness. Poison drips from their mouth as they breathe in the poisonous atmosphere like zombies. Meanwhile, The Light Beings roam in their perfumed, elegantly decorated chambers inside the mind, as companions and guardians. The Light Beings are personified thoughts, but also real-life people. When she dissociates, it’s probably so as to stay away from the poisonous atmosphere when the forbidden door malfunctions. That poison rarely affects anyone else, besides her self, it is confined within her being.

Interacting with mental constructs

Have you ever felt like someone interacts with an image or representation of you, that they’ve created and are feeding in their mind, rather than the reality of who you are? You can usually sense it while it happens, it’s often tiring, you might get uncomfortable; depending on the discrepancy between your identity and your interlocutor’s concept of you, your response might naturally be to emotionally distance yourself from them, your body may recoil in distaste, and you might feel like you want to stay away from such situations. It takes too much energy to interact with people who are trying to define you on their own terms, to shape your reality, to induce that they know how you feel or who you are better than you do. You may perceive it as an attack on your self-concept, it feels perversely counter-intuitive- if everyone did this we’d all be trapped in illusions, interacting with our own minds and their fabrications…the distances between us would grow and grow and there would be no genuine connection; authenticity and understanding the reality of another human being completely thrown out of the window. These fabrications are often based on archetypes, on previous experiences, on patterns we have formed in our minds, and shadows bred there. To a certain extent, there is something natural about it, as, in its purer forms, this process helps us make sense of everything.

Everything is mediated through the filter of our consciousness and making associations and creating our concepts of others is inevitable. Labelling. Establishing connections between subjects, to have a point of reference and know what to expect, in the process of interpreting reality and personality. Identifying differences in others, to see ourselves as separate and unique, to define ourselves in the light of this separation, to reinforce our ego’s supremacy. It’s also a survival mechanism, recognising red flags, so you know what or whom to stay away from, whom to trust, who may or may not represent a threat to your well-being. Thinking of people in patterns – the field of psychology is based on this. In the case of someone who has a personality disorder, for instance, it can be very helpful to have a name for what they are experiencing and how they see the world, it can make them feel understood, give them a sense of belonging, a sense of control over themselves and their emotions, encourage them to make a conscious effort to identify with the awareness behind their thoughts and emotions, rather than with a particular emotion (especially if it’s a negative emotion, like anger, fear) or a thought they may be experiencing, that may be intrusive, obsessive, and dictated by a disorder. Of course, on the other hand, there is also the stigma that comes with such labels, risking to be put in a negative light, being seen through that filter, being defined by a certain disorder or affliction. Unfortunately, some can internalise this, thinking of themselves and their disorder symbiotically, it can affect their self-worth. In general, it is quite limiting. Thinking of people in patterns or associating them with something you create in your mind can be limiting. It diminishes them, distorts their essence, reduces their whole identity to a tendency, an idea, a bunch of words, an echo- in the mind of ego-led individuals with narcissistic tendencies. If you interact with representations of people, with mental constructs, with objects, you don’t really allow yourself to see people for what they are. This is often because you may have internalised certain superficial ideas about the world and may be applying them to everyone, consciously or unconsciously. Sometimes it happens out of fear. Of the unknown, the uncontrolled, the unpredictable. A representation is something you have control over, an image you can mould to fit your world view, your ego’s supremacy, something you can annihilate in your head; a real person is something you can’t control, they exist outside the realm of your ego, and thus can be a threat to ego.

Re-defining someone, re-structuring their narrative and identity is problematic, because people don’t tend to like being told who they are, why they do the things they do, what their motivations, feelings, or thoughts are. They often dislike being told they are wrong in some way, faulty in their behaviour, life choices, thinking, identity. It will put them in a position of defence. Such interpretations can be offensive, and often deeply ingrained in the adviser’s specific belief system and incomplete perception of others and they function through projection. You can’t help but dislike or avoid someone who assumes or acts like they know you better than you know yourself, who tries to re-define you in ways you don’t identify with, it’s a natural response of self-preservation. It’s unpleasant to have someone interact with a version of you that doesn’t exist. In my case, someone giving me advice with such constructs in mind would find themselves stepping into a minefield. I know I have a resistance to accepting advice, in general, because I feel like I’m the one who knows what is best for me, but, often, if it’s reasonable advice, devoid of projections, formulated in a constructive way, and if I can feel it comes from a genuine place in someone’s heart, someone who doesn’t interact with a false mental construct, someone who believes in me and doesn’t claim to know what I want better than I do, doesn’t try to dictate how I feel, who wants to see me do well and be the best version of me, then I appreciate it. If, however, I can feel that a piece of advice is insincere, in the sense that it is centred around the adviser, it’s all about them and not me, all about their self-image/ego, their need to be in control, to reinforce their belief system, then I have resistance to it, I find it distasteful. (Unsolicited advice is distasteful in general.) There are some descriptors and emotions that I don’t associate with my self-concept, and I can’t stand it when others imply or assume it about me. Okay, this does sound like an egoic defence, we all have them. What matters is not letting ego dictate our interactions with or perceptions of others, and not defining ourselves in conscious or unconscious opposition with others.

This is particularly problematic when you think about the well-known mental process of ‘other’-ing when it comes to racial, gender, nationality, or sexuality differences, different religious or political beliefs, although it’s not restricted to these areas, for it can apply on many levels, personal and cultural. This process can have a great negative impact on human connections, because it obstructs the capacity to have empathy for fellow human beings; and it can manifest itself through passive-aggressiveness, animosity, or it can become especially toxic when it facilitates aggression. Narcissistic tendencies are prevalent in contemporary society. If you pay attention, you can see the seeds of narcissism very easily, and recognise the narcissistic way of relating to others as mental constructs, even in yourself. Depending on the degree of resistance determined by your ego, this awareness might make you more open to seeing beyond these representations. With an awareness of inner pride and prejudice, of the constant process of mediation, you may no longer be quick to reduce people to fabrications, project any misplaced thoughts and traits onto them, and interact with mental constructs. We are human, we are fallible, our perceptions particularly so. Since this often centres around the demands of the ego to see itself as superior to others, let’s have a look at narcissism. Sam Vaknin, a psychologist who specialises in narcissism, who is a diagnosed narcissist, provided an insightful description of the way narcissists relate to inner objects in their fantasy world. Additionally, he talked about the beneficial nature and use (beneficial to the narcissist, detrimental to everyone around them) of this defence mechanism and way of relating of the narcissist, refuting the common thought that (pathological) narcissists lack the capacity for emotion. They are simply no longer in touch with their emotions, and don’t have an understanding of them, because, at some point, they may have decided that emotions can be debilitating and destabilising, hence it’s better to detach and alienate themselves from them. Their emotions are experienced through a “cognitive analytical filter”. They also interact with others through these filters, rather than forming a genuine connection. The extreme cognitive distortions of others happening in the minds of pathological narcissists can be seen as an amplification of the process that even people of a more sound and reasonable mental configuration indulge in, albeit with more restraint.

“The narcissist has impaired reality testing. And the very essence or definition of pathological narcissism is a grandiose fantasy. A narcissist can’t make the difference between fantasy and reality. Also, because they interact with inner objects, they confuse inner objects with outer/external objects. You know the famous mechanism of snapshotting, where they interact with a snapshot of you. They take a snapshot of you and then they interact with it, with your representation, your avatar, your introject, not with you. What they do is they internalise external objects, especially significant objects, especially objects that can cause them pain by let’s say abandoning them, so they internalise these objects and then they continue to interact with representations within a shared fantastic space. And they can’t tell the difference. This is why they mislabel emotions. Narcissists can feel intense emotions. Many scholars speculated that perhaps narcissism and psychopathy are reactions, defensive reactions, defensive attempts to avoid very deep emotionality. Perhaps narcissists emote too much, too intensely. They are about to be overwhelmed by their emotions, so they isolate themselves from their emotions, they put up a fire wall, a fortress to avoid their emotions. The thing is they feel, they experience the emotion, but they don’t know what it is. Because they are divorced from reality, […] they experience their emotions through a cognitive analytical filter. They have to ask themselves what they are feeling. And then they compare their experiences, their reactions, their wounds, their affect, their behaviours, they compare all this to an internal database. A database where they have entries and listings for how people behave when. How people behave when they are happy, and so on.’” – Sam Vaknin

If we extrapolate this description beyond the context of pathological narcissism, and we recognise the resonance of this mechanism beyond those around us who are pathological, not only does the aforementioned process lead to an alienation from others because we don’t really see the reality of others, but also to an alienation from ourselves and our emotions. Because our culture becomes increasingly narcissistic, our relationships with reality tend to get warped, the filter between us and reality gets muddled. Since we don’t integrate certain parts of ourselves as it’s more comfortable to live in a fantasy world where we and the constructs in our minds are infallible, we also don’t properly integrate other people’s realities within our conceptual world. This happens especially when other people embody specific aspects that are reflections of parts of ourselves that we dislike or deny, that we consider to be negative.

Consciousness is a complicated terrain to navigate, even our own, let alone others’. This awareness, that everyone has an internal life we either know nothing about or only have a glimpse of, that all people identify and see themselves in particular ways, that their inner lives shouldn’t be confused with our mental constructs, and shouldn’t be reduced to the way we consciously or unconsciously restructure their existence in our minds- this awareness can only have a positive impact. Because it fosters connection and care, discourages violence, and makes us more attuned to the emotions and realities of others. Perhaps if more people had this insight, this awareness of discrepancy, there would be more understanding and kindness in the world. Perhaps in a less narcissistic society that values authenticity more than ego fortresses and self-centredness, kindness and empathy would be viewed as signs of strength, not of weakness or fakeness.

In the spirit of mental conversations with authors, I will include a more pessimistic view by the supreme lyrical nihilist, Emil Cioran, who believes we are all living embodiments of our own private dogmas, and we celebrate ourselves for it. Whilst his view doesn’t clash with what I wrote, since it reinforces the idea that each of us lives within the parameters of his or her inner universe, the pessimism lies in the fatalistic rigidity of this narrative and his conclusion that awakening from our “dogmatic sleep” would equal death.

“Life has dogmas more immutable than theology, each existence being anchored in infallibilities which exceed all the lucubrations of madness or of faith. Even the skeptic, in love with his doubts, turns out to be a fanatic of skepticism. Man is the dogmatic being par exellence, and his dogmas are all the deeper when he does not formulate them, when he is unaware of them, and when he follows them.

We all believe in many more things than we think, we harbour intolerances, we cherish bloody prejudices, and, defending our ideas with extreme means, we travel the world like ambulatory and irrefragable fortresses. Each of us is a supreme dogma to himself, no theology protects its god as we protect our self. How to escape the absolute of oneself? One would have to imagine a being without instincts, without a name, and to whom his own image would be unknown. But everything in the world gives us back our own features; night itself is never dark enough to keep us from being reflected in it.

The man who does not adore himself is yet to be born. Everything that lives loves itself; if not, what would be the source of the dread which breaks out in the depths and on the surfaces of life? Each of us is, for himself, the one fixed point in the universe. And if someone dies for an idea, it is because it is his idea, and his idea is his life.

No critique of any kind of reason will waken man from his “dogmatic sleep.” It may shake the unconscious certitudes which abound in his philosophy and substitute more flexible propositions for his rigid affirmations, but how, by a rational procedure, will it manage to shake the creature, huddled over its own dogmas, without bringing about its very death?” – Emil Cioran on Unconscious Dogmas

On social chameleons, self-monitoring, and other thoughts along the lines of connection and the self

Where do we draw the line between adapting ourselves and our personalities to the people around us by making ourselves liked in order to connect with others and blend into social environments, caring about what people think just enough for it to act as a catalyst for fulfilling connections and successful interactions, and holding onto our individuality and sense of self based on inner beliefs? Up to a certain point, adaptability is normal in any interaction because, as social beings, we tend to bond by relating to another person’s experiences, thoughts, views, and so on, and for that we can’t be rigid or left unchanged, we need to be open to invite all this information from someone else’s world into ours; when inevitable differences arise, they should ideally be respected and sometimes accommodated. It’s also normal in the sense that, sometimes involuntarily, your personality and energy tend to be influenced by people you interact with and their own vibes, especially if you’re an empath, so, attuned to the moods and sensibilities of others. There is also a necessity for a certain degree of conscious adaptability and flexibility ingrained in many social interactions, in entering new environments, and facing a variety of people from different backgrounds, ages, and cultures. The social chameleon (I prefer this term rather than ‘people-pleaser’ which sounds pretty sad) is highly skilful in impression management and Self-Monitoring, being self-aware and aware of others; he or she thrives by reading social cues and charmingly acting and adapting accordingly to specific situations and types of people. Since adaptability is one of the main transferable skills you are asked to prove in interviews and job applications, this is a quality that is often valued in society and viewed as being linked to interpersonal and professional success.

When does this become a problem? When you bypass your personal boundaries and needs, such an attitude or way of living can take on a self-sabotaging quality and an unnatural influence over your life, that is ultimately detrimental to your well-being and your individuality. This happens when the focus you place on adapting to different personalities or social groups by making yourself liked and likeable at all costs becomes an impediment to living authentically and to being in touch with your feelings, interests, and desires. It can make you feel alienated from yourself and it can make others feel like they don’t really know you. The first steps you might take down this slippery slope could be silencing or diminishing your voice to accommodate someone else’s ego (particularly relevant to women tiptoeing around the male ego, or even around other women’s egos), switching between social masks and doing things to accommodate people in general, at the expense of corrupting your spirit, practising unnecessary humility, gaslighting yourself and doubting yourself too much when something goes wrong or when someone puts you in a negative light, putting up with (whatever you may see as) adverse or unfriendly treatment and making excuses for it, blaming yourself, and wanting to fix the situation, and so on. There is a fine line there between being empathetic and understanding of other people’s feelings and being unhealthily willing to compromise on your expectations and needs.

If it appears that you have people-pleasing tendencies, a lot of people pick up on that vibe and your boundaries may be challenged. There is also a shadowy side to people-pleasing: whilst it might seem like an altruistic act and it can be, it can also be a somewhat manipulative approach to get people to like you so that you maintain control over situations, but this is not inherently bad and not everyone who does this is conscious of it or a control freak or has a conscious ulterior motive. And the most harmful aspect is that people-pleasers associate their worth with the capacity to gain other people’s approval. You can be pleasant to be around- as that is clearly an advantage in most situations- but without being a push-over and without relying on people’s reactions and impressions of you, on their response to your behaviour. For this, you need to have a decently stable self-image- so know yourself- and what your expectations and standards are. And then you need to ideally spend your time with people who match those expectations and standards or otherwise, to communicate that need. Go beyond being pleasant. Be an inspiring, uplifting presence. Learn to truly listen to someone and allow trails of their consciousness to permeate yours, without filtering them through your fixated thought patterns too much. Just as I previously mentioned in an article that the best approach in the process of reading a book is to suspend your interpretative frameworks initially, you can do the same thing when you read another person, so you can invite their world into yours.

I’m glad to have reached a stage in my life journey where, after meeting someone new and chatting for a while, instead of wondering “Does this person like me?” it’s more important to first ask myself “Do I like this person?”. I’m not a passive or self-sacrificing person, I’ve never been, but I haven’t always claimed my social and emotional agency to the point where my likeability becomes irrelevant or less relevant than authenticity and personal satisfaction-so there have been times when my self-presentation has overpowered aspects of my life which should have been more important – though not in a ‘blending in’ type of way. These days, instead of impression management, I ask myself questions such as: Does this person add a positive contribution to my life and well-being? Are they a presence I like being around? How do I feel around them? Shift the focus this way. It’s liberating. What value or qualities do people add to your life? It could be that they’re kind, they make you laugh and are fun to be around, they’re thoughtful, relaxing, considerate, helpful, interesting, they just get you, they have a stimulating mind in addition to similar interests or an openness to discuss your interests- or a combination of such traits that you simply click with. If my assessment is positive, then, I value their response to me on a deeper level. Anyway, people are more than a combination of factors, so I don’t believe in having a rigid checklist of traits for friendships or other connections because our minds often override pre-established ideas when we click or feel drawn towards people we wouldn’t have expected to do so or when we don’t click with people we apparently had so much in common with. I personally only have a clear, uncompromising checklist of what I profoundly dislike or am repelled by in interactions. When there is reciprocal appreciation and things really work out, that ‘pleasing’ part is organic and ingrained in your interactions, there is no need to perform or control as it’s all spontaneous and there is definitely no need to feel like you compromise your self.

If your focus is on people-pleasing, it can be self-effacing or, to sound more dramatic, self-annihilating, as you tend to lose yourself in the process of presenting yourself in the way you think others expect you to. This could mean your fashion sense, your personality, the current version of your identity. Identity is fluid, I’ve always believed this, and some of your personality variables are, in fact, altered by interaction. My life mantra seems relevant here: “I am rooted, but I flow” (Virginia Woolf’s words). You have a core, the part of you that is grounded, rooted, true no matter what happens. This is surrounded by waters in which you flow and with which you can merge, meaning you can be open to new experiences and be shaped and re-shaped by them. But be mindful of where you flow and don’t be scared to swim against the current when you have to. Meet new personalities, be amicable and let the right worlds enter yours, without losing yourself in the other.

Life observations and tips on how to pass through life with awareness

– Empowered people contribute to the empowerment of those around them.
– Avoid judging things at surface level. You need to dig a few layers deeper without closing your eyes when you find treasure rooms or catacombs. On the surface, you might be trapped in a Fata Morgana.
– It’s true that high expectations often lead to disillusionment with the world; however, as long as you don’t let yourself be disillusioned with your self, high expectations can be used as fuel to build and improve your life.
– Falsity contaminates. Authenticity inspires; it’s contagious, enveloped in light, and arouses kindness. Its adepts are a dying breed, so value them.
– We all have both light and darkness within us. Some will see the angelic, others the devilish, and such judgements are partly reflections of the watcher. I wouldn’t say you should never see yourself through the eyes of another as that could inhibit empathy and diminish your humanity, or simply prevent positive things from happening- instead, be selective of the eyes you borrow, why, and when…
– …and whatever you do, never lose your own vision, lest you be swallowed by the mouth of the world and become a watered-down version of yourself.
– Sometimes you won’t know if something is right or wrong for you until you try it. If you realise it feels wrong, give up. If it feels right, carry on, regardless of external views. Not all compasses for life navigation reveal the same directions.
– Your beliefs, perspective on, or perceptions of many subjects will shift over time. This can manifest in your response to and interpretations of the world around you, which can, in turn, re-shape your world.
– You should create your life, not just react to it. Relinquish fatalistic views.
– Don’t fall into toxic ego traps.
– As you age, years start flying by in a blink. I’m young, and I already feel life slipping away so quickly. Don’t live in the past and don’t spend too much time lamenting the death of past moments or things that are out of your control.
– Don’t become complacent. If you ever feel ‘there is more to life than this’, whether you’re thinking of your job, lifestyle, or experiences, you are probably right. Explore and feel new things, pump up your dopamine and adrenaline levels. Take risks, but have a safety net.
– Embrace who you are. Maybe in your adolescence and your twenties that’s a meaningless or elusive statement since you’re constantly learning new things, going through changes, growing as a person. Well, hopefully your whole life will consist of that. But embracing yourself encompasses that fluidity too, it means giving yourself a break, recognising all aspects of yourself and accepting them (if they’re not harmful or toxic). It’s okay to cultivate happy thoughts and it’s okay to be cynical sometimes. It’s okay to be funny and it’s okay to be serious. Intense and light-hearted and giggly. Sociable and reserved. Impulsive or stoic. It’s okay to explore your provocative side and it’s also okay to be timid.  To see yourself as a collection of thoughts and memories. To be made of many things, without any single aspect defining you by itself. It’s okay to be real.